摘要为优化肉类消费结构，引导居民选择营养价值高的生鲜猪肉，本文借鉴Keyhole标识、心脏检查标志、较健康选择标志、指引星标签、选择标识、NuVal评分标签的生鲜猪肉营养评价算法，构建富含营养素食物模型对《中国食物成分表（第6版第2册）》的19 种生鲜猪肉开展营养评价发现，这些猪肉的NRF9.3值为－0.19～0.94，可应用阈值、评分、评级三类包装正面（front of package，FOP）标签，即对NRF9.3值＞0采用单一符号的FOP标签显示营养价值高的生鲜猪肉；将NRF9.3值转化为1～100评分，评分越高，营养价值越高；对NRF9.3值＜0、0.02～0.31、0.32～0.61、0.62～0.90分别显示0、1、2、3星评级，星级越多，营养价值越高。总体看，评级型FOP标签综合了阈值和评分标签两大优点，既能对生鲜猪肉的营养价值进行排序，又能提高消费者的选购效率。因此，评级FOP标签适合用来显示生鲜猪肉的整体营养价值。
Abstract：In order to optimize meat consumption structure and lead consumers to choose fresh pork with high nutritional value, this study developed a nutrient-rich food (NRF) model based on the criteria of the Keyhole symbol, the Heart-check Mark, the Healthier choice symbol, the Guiding stars labling, the Choices logo, and the NuVal nutritional scoring system for nutritional evaluation of 19 kinds of fresh pork from the Chinese Food Composition Tables (volume 2, 6th Edition). It was found that NRF9.3 index of these fresh pork ranged from ?0.19 to 0.94, which could be applied to three types of front of package (FOP) labeling: threshold, scoring, and rating. Specifically, a single symbol of FOP labeling was used to show fresh pork with NRF9.3 index greater than 0 to have high nutritional value. These NRF9.3 values were converted into scores of 1–100, and a higher score represented higher nutritional value. NRF9.3 less than 0 and in the range of 0.02–0.31, 0.32–0.61 and 0.62–0.90 showed zero, one, two and three stars respectively. More stars implied higher nutritional value. In general, the rating type could combine the benefits of the two other types, not only ranking the nutritional value of fresh pork, but also improving consumers’ purchasing efficiency. Therefore, the rating type of FOP labeling seems suitable for displaying the overall nutritional value of fresh pork.
黄泽颖，卢 曼. 我国生鲜猪肉包装正面标签研究进展[J]. 肉类研究, 2022, 36(1): 63-68.
HUANG Zeying, LU Man. Progress in Front of Package Labeling of Fresh Pork in China. Meat Research, 2022, 36(1): 63-68.
2022, Vol. 36 
